@Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
@Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Why can't SIN and Trident merge.
Let's face it. MAD & SUN merged to form MARS.
And don't give me the crap that SUN is ARES's training clan and therefore they can merge.
Please just look at the number of people who went over to SUN from ARES.
I believe that someone posted 7 links of former ARES clan masters above level 200, who left for SUN, and then JOINED MAD, during the announcement of the merge.
If SUN and MAD can merge together, please play fair.
Allow Trident and SIN to merge.
Let's face it. MAD & SUN merged to form MARS.
And don't give me the crap that SUN is ARES's training clan and therefore they can merge.
Please just look at the number of people who went over to SUN from ARES.
I believe that someone posted 7 links of former ARES clan masters above level 200, who left for SUN, and then JOINED MAD, during the announcement of the merge.
If SUN and MAD can merge together, please play fair.
Allow Trident and SIN to merge.
-
- Unfamiliar
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 13 Nov 2011, 10:19
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
I propose that V merges with WAR
-
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 22 Nov 2011, 23:33
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Because you would have too many level 200s. You are limited to 15% in any merger. Figure out who you want to kick, and then make it happen.
-
- Unfamiliar
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 19 Oct 2011, 12:32
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
*it has begun! *just sit tight & munch pop corn.
BTW i still wait for the 3 shitty token whine since small clan in tier S cant afford repair & they just stand below 2 min per each token against big clans + allied clans.
BTW i still wait for the 3 shitty token whine since small clan in tier S cant afford repair & they just stand below 2 min per each token against big clans + allied clans.
Last edited by Rahman Juniatmoko on 12 Mar 2012, 13:31, edited 1 time in total.
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Dirty Stallis, we checked. Our limit would not exceed 15 percent of clan size..
Devs?
Devs?
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
If it is indeed true that several people bailed ARES, leaving it a shell of a clan (and this is certainly looking like the case from their recent losses), because they wanted to circumvent the "rules" and merge under the guise of "absorbing a lower clan" then they should be penalized for cheating. Otherwise you're allowing a bias by letting their merge happen and no one else's. Or should we all adopt their poor example of competition and just circumvent the rules so we can get ahead?
-
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 22 Nov 2011, 23:33
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Chai wrote:
> Dirty Stallis, we checked. Our limit would not exceed 15 percent of clan
> size..
>
> Devs?
You sure? A quick look down the rankings list indicates that a significant number of 200+ would need to be hiding on thier mini captain to stay under 15%.
You should also look at the number of 180+ and 160+.
> Dirty Stallis, we checked. Our limit would not exceed 15 percent of clan
> size..
>
> Devs?
You sure? A quick look down the rankings list indicates that a significant number of 200+ would need to be hiding on thier mini captain to stay under 15%.
You should also look at the number of 180+ and 160+.
-
- Obscure
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 30 Oct 2011, 19:39
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
its like furypred all over :P
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Lunariad wrote:
> If it is indeed true that several people bailed ARES, leaving it a shell of
> a clan (and this is certainly looking like the case from their recent
> losses), because they wanted to circumvent the "rules" and merge
> under the guise of "absorbing a lower clan" then they should be
> penalized for cheating. Otherwise you're allowing a bias by letting their
> merge happen and no one else's. Or should we all adopt their poor example
> of competition and just circumvent the rules so we can get ahead?
/me sits with a Popcorn Bucket and enjoy this whine-puking fest.
> If it is indeed true that several people bailed ARES, leaving it a shell of
> a clan (and this is certainly looking like the case from their recent
> losses), because they wanted to circumvent the "rules" and merge
> under the guise of "absorbing a lower clan" then they should be
> penalized for cheating. Otherwise you're allowing a bias by letting their
> merge happen and no one else's. Or should we all adopt their poor example
> of competition and just circumvent the rules so we can get ahead?
/me sits with a Popcorn Bucket and enjoy this whine-puking fest.
-
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 22 Nov 2011, 23:33
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Lunariad wrote:
> If it is indeed true that several people bailed ARES, leaving it a shell of
> a clan (and this is certainly looking like the case from their recent
> losses), because they wanted to circumvent the "rules" and merge
> under the guise of "absorbing a lower clan" then they should be
> penalized for cheating. Otherwise you're allowing a bias by letting their
> merge happen and no one else's. Or should we all adopt their poor example
> of competition and just circumvent the rules so we can get ahead?
Do you really think that the developer in charge of this is stupid enough not to run a quick level check before carrying out the merge?
> If it is indeed true that several people bailed ARES, leaving it a shell of
> a clan (and this is certainly looking like the case from their recent
> losses), because they wanted to circumvent the "rules" and merge
> under the guise of "absorbing a lower clan" then they should be
> penalized for cheating. Otherwise you're allowing a bias by letting their
> merge happen and no one else's. Or should we all adopt their poor example
> of competition and just circumvent the rules so we can get ahead?
Do you really think that the developer in charge of this is stupid enough not to run a quick level check before carrying out the merge?
-
- Obscure
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 30 Oct 2011, 19:39
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
sin has 10 lvl 200s+
E = 4
total = 14
14/82 = 17%
E = 4
total = 14
14/82 = 17%
-
- Unfamiliar
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 15:03
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Edwin Martinus wrote:
> sin has 10 lvl 200s+
> E = 4
>
> total = 14
>
> 14/82 = 17%
Tee hee heee
> sin has 10 lvl 200s+
> E = 4
>
> total = 14
>
> 14/82 = 17%
Tee hee heee
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
Mr Stallis,
"Do you really think that the developer in charge of this is stupid enough not to run a quick level check before carrying out the merge?"
I'm pretty damn sure you know what I mean.
I did not call the Devs stupid.
Neither will I say that I have been wrong all along.
Questions like these won't get either of us.
"Do you really think that the developer in charge of this is stupid enough not to run a quick level check before carrying out the merge?"
I'm pretty damn sure you know what I mean.
I did not call the Devs stupid.
Neither will I say that I have been wrong all along.
Questions like these won't get either of us.
-
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 22 Nov 2011, 23:33
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
What was said above is that the only way the SUN/MAD merger could happen is if someone didn't check captain levels properly, and allowed a merger to happen that did not meet the rules. That can only mean the person thinks the developer did not bother to check the captain levels, even though that was the first rule posted in the merger announcement.
If we agree that the developer would have checked to ensure that all the rules posted in the merger thread were followed, exactly what is your concen?
If we agree that the developer would have checked to ensure that all the rules posted in the merger thread were followed, exactly what is your concen?
-
- Recognised
- Posts: 459
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 09:01
- Location: Riot City Athens
Re: @Devs, If MAD & SUN can merge..
lol Besides the recruitment level limits, isn't there supposed to be a 4 days cooldown between moving clans for those lvl 199 or higher?
o.o
o.o