Andrew Deasey wrote:
> I missed that question.. where was that? I have been away for a day to calm
> down.. lol. I am just having fun now, there is no raised blood preesure on
> my part. I am smiling widely.
> I sense I quiver of fear that is extending to your heart right now
> though... be careful, or you will end up like german kid.
>
> To answer that question... I am not arguing. Please take note of my first
> post back here... There is no anger. It is only advice for you to let this
> post die...
> But you dont get it...
>
> So thats why I am enjoying myself now by telling you how stupid you are.
> The aussie slang word for people like you is Dipstick.
>
> =D
OH dear Big Bad Paq is about to stick a pineapple up my asshole! Or was that a cactus? Nvm. Oh yeah I'm sure hella scared of a bottomfeeder taking a vacation in WRATH huh?
Btw, you seem to have lost some steam. Wheres the insults man? That seriously all you have to offer? I was looking forward to learning a few new Aussie insults.
* I take back that Apology
-
Kong Jun Yin
- Unknown
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 11:59
- Location: Deep, deep up your attic!
- Contact:
-
Gary Paul
- Well known
- Posts: 805
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 16:38
- Location: Hotrodding around Cambodia with all the Ultimate Levellers.
- Contact:
Re: * I take back that Apology
Why can't Australians all get along?
http://youtu.be/aGuNsiSZ9RI
http://youtu.be/aGuNsiSZ9RI
Re: * I take back that Apology
Guys, can we just cool down a little bit?
It is true this forum has no rule, people may flame someone or clan.
But it always back to yourself whenever you think it is right to flame someone or not.
If you have cooled down, you can read my opinion about this case.
About the 1,000 APs, I also mistakenly thought it as a secret promotion. However, in my opinion, I can include it in 2 case:
1. Small ocho player, include those who buy 50 ocho just to get 1,000 APs, they will unlikely to use ocho for buying APs, so they can just let the AP bank in debt.
2. Big ocho player, who buy ocho regularly and likely to use ocho for buying APs, they just like get AP IN ADVANCE before they need to pay for it.
It is actually simple case, and if we want to know who is wrong, I am sorry but I think both side (developers and players) is wrong. Developers can be said to be wrong as this bug can be appeared, but NOBODY IS PERFECT, and we as players should realize that 1,000 APs is kind of too good as a promotional event without announcement thus reporting it, which we didn't do so, as our side of mistake (I felt strange though, but I didn't report it).
P.s. Congrats rookles, for graduating from Reputable to High Profile
It is true this forum has no rule, people may flame someone or clan.
But it always back to yourself whenever you think it is right to flame someone or not.
If you have cooled down, you can read my opinion about this case.
About the 1,000 APs, I also mistakenly thought it as a secret promotion. However, in my opinion, I can include it in 2 case:
1. Small ocho player, include those who buy 50 ocho just to get 1,000 APs, they will unlikely to use ocho for buying APs, so they can just let the AP bank in debt.
2. Big ocho player, who buy ocho regularly and likely to use ocho for buying APs, they just like get AP IN ADVANCE before they need to pay for it.
It is actually simple case, and if we want to know who is wrong, I am sorry but I think both side (developers and players) is wrong. Developers can be said to be wrong as this bug can be appeared, but NOBODY IS PERFECT, and we as players should realize that 1,000 APs is kind of too good as a promotional event without announcement thus reporting it, which we didn't do so, as our side of mistake (I felt strange though, but I didn't report it).
P.s. Congrats rookles, for graduating from Reputable to High Profile
Re: * I take back that Apology
If u trying hard to WIN just say so we will let u win.
But by further stirring things is not going to paint anything very pretty.
2) If you did not realise that you were given it in error. This argument was first used successfully back in 1950 in a case between Lloyds Bank and Cecily Kate Brooks. Ms Brooks, EXPECTING a SIMILIAR PAYMENT to the AMOUNT wrongly credited to her account, argued that she had genuinely spent the money while believing it belonged to her.
Generally, this kind of case tends to be the exception rather than the rule and PLEADING IGNORANCE IS LIKELY YO FALL UPON DEAF EARS unless the amount involved is tiny.
Trying arguing ur way out.
But by further stirring things is not going to paint anything very pretty.
2) If you did not realise that you were given it in error. This argument was first used successfully back in 1950 in a case between Lloyds Bank and Cecily Kate Brooks. Ms Brooks, EXPECTING a SIMILIAR PAYMENT to the AMOUNT wrongly credited to her account, argued that she had genuinely spent the money while believing it belonged to her.
Generally, this kind of case tends to be the exception rather than the rule and PLEADING IGNORANCE IS LIKELY YO FALL UPON DEAF EARS unless the amount involved is tiny.
Trying arguing ur way out.
-
Andrew Deasey
- Obscure
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 12:08
- Location: 3013
Re: * I take back that Apology
My new mate Knog said...
"OH dear Big Bad Paq is about to stick a pineapple up my asshole! Or was that a cactus? Nvm. Oh yeah I'm sure hella scared of a bottomfeeder taking a vacation in WRATH huh?
Btw, you seem to have lost some steam. Wheres the insults man? That seriously all you have to offer? I was looking forward to learning a few new Aussie insults."
You dont really want me too..... :P
You cant handle it my poor little toy
"OH dear Big Bad Paq is about to stick a pineapple up my asshole! Or was that a cactus? Nvm. Oh yeah I'm sure hella scared of a bottomfeeder taking a vacation in WRATH huh?
Btw, you seem to have lost some steam. Wheres the insults man? That seriously all you have to offer? I was looking forward to learning a few new Aussie insults."
You dont really want me too..... :P
You cant handle it my poor little toy
-
Kong Jun Yin
- Unknown
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 11:59
- Location: Deep, deep up your attic!
- Contact:
Re: * I take back that Apology
I'll be adventurous and try for it. Go ahead :)
You have my permission.
Don't tell me your profanity vocabulary has already been expended? You wanted to have some fun and laughs. Lets all get some.
You have my permission.
Don't tell me your profanity vocabulary has already been expended? You wanted to have some fun and laughs. Lets all get some.
-
Andrew Deasey
- Obscure
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 12:08
- Location: 3013
Re: * I take back that Apology
kong... honestly, I really couldnt be fucked bothering with you any more...
You abused me first.. you really have proven that you are nothing but sleazy whore, and you are the Classic Dick Liquor (LICKER. I know you are too stupid to have figured that out yet) Just keep agreeing with LL and stay on that Bandwagon.. WOO WOO.. all aboard the LL "bend over and take it train".. You have VIP seats on that train I know ;)
by Kong Jun Yin on Yesterday, 14:17
Sorry Andrew, but it appears the few neurones in your cranium are missing the point.
Did your mother tell you that bringing your AP back to 0 is compulsory?
Unless you admit that you have 2 week old mouldy cheese stuffed in socks for brains,
http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259 ... alian.aspx
Another peice of Australian Law for you too read...You stupid..... hahahaha. ;)
You abused me first.. you really have proven that you are nothing but sleazy whore, and you are the Classic Dick Liquor (LICKER. I know you are too stupid to have figured that out yet) Just keep agreeing with LL and stay on that Bandwagon.. WOO WOO.. all aboard the LL "bend over and take it train".. You have VIP seats on that train I know ;)
by Kong Jun Yin on Yesterday, 14:17
Sorry Andrew, but it appears the few neurones in your cranium are missing the point.
Did your mother tell you that bringing your AP back to 0 is compulsory?
Unless you admit that you have 2 week old mouldy cheese stuffed in socks for brains,
http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259 ... alian.aspx
Another peice of Australian Law for you too read...You stupid..... hahahaha. ;)
-
Fábio Rodrigues
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 164
- Joined: 06 Nov 2011, 16:14
- Location: PORTOOOOOOO
- Contact:
Re: * I take back that Apology
This is still going.
The persistence of you people amazes me.
The persistence of you people amazes me.
-
Master of Clan X
- Prominent
- Posts: 3105
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 03:39
- Location: I am the Master of Clan X
Re: * I take back that Apology
Andrew Deasey wrote:
> http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259 ... alian.aspx
>
> Another peice of Australian Law for you too read...You stupid.....
> hahahaha. ;)
Why would he give a rat's arse about a law that doesn't apply to him?
> http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259 ... alian.aspx
>
> Another peice of Australian Law for you too read...You stupid.....
> hahahaha. ;)
Why would he give a rat's arse about a law that doesn't apply to him?
-
Jeremiah Wang ZhiYong
- Low profile
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 07:16
- Location: Singapore
Re: * I take back that Apology
zyblack wrote:
> Samuel Chiou wrote:
> > Just face it, KudaCreampie. Your cheating ways of gamesmanship taught to
> > you in the brothel of scum and depravity that is BIB have failed you!
> >
> > Now shine my shoes, illiterate toad.
>
> Wow. I amazed at the lack of control and moderating in this forum. Comments like that
> would warrant a warning if not an immediate ban in other forums. I see multiple posts
> just like this all over the board and it seem to be the norm here seeing that even a
> Site Admin call the customers fools openly. Are we totally allowed to be insulting
> and denigrating to others here without any form of penalty? Even if we insult
> moderators (is there one?) or the site admin? Is there any boundaries in the first
> place?? The management team has no issue with their conduct of their moderating team
> or how they respond to the public or customers?
>
> Peter and Snowflakes at least takes the effort to be open and polite which gives this
> board a resemblance of civility and order. Kudos to them.
Welcome to the world of BS. Especially BS forum.
Thought the BS Support is a way more polite option. :D
> Samuel Chiou wrote:
> > Just face it, KudaCreampie. Your cheating ways of gamesmanship taught to
> > you in the brothel of scum and depravity that is BIB have failed you!
> >
> > Now shine my shoes, illiterate toad.
>
> Wow. I amazed at the lack of control and moderating in this forum. Comments like that
> would warrant a warning if not an immediate ban in other forums. I see multiple posts
> just like this all over the board and it seem to be the norm here seeing that even a
> Site Admin call the customers fools openly. Are we totally allowed to be insulting
> and denigrating to others here without any form of penalty? Even if we insult
> moderators (is there one?) or the site admin? Is there any boundaries in the first
> place?? The management team has no issue with their conduct of their moderating team
> or how they respond to the public or customers?
>
> Peter and Snowflakes at least takes the effort to be open and polite which gives this
> board a resemblance of civility and order. Kudos to them.
Welcome to the world of BS. Especially BS forum.
Thought the BS Support is a way more polite option. :D
-
Andrew Deasey
- Obscure
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 12:08
- Location: 3013
Re: * I take back that Apology
Fábio Rodrigues wrote:
> This is still going.
>
>
>
> The persistence of you people amazes me.
I know... sorry Fabio. I already said awhile ago now that I am letting the AP thing go...
LL started it again.. Not me. and Kong has just shown his true light as predicted.
I want to let it go to... but this is just to funny for me now.
I really thought my leaving it all alone would have helped... I have been reading thought it all again now since it started...and all I did was stand up for what alot of people were thinking, and Argued my ass off to get LL to understand it...
Its a stalemate with me and LL...I am cool with it.. I am just really suprised that the things LL picked out of my post earlier were the 2 negatives amongst everything nice I said.
Why LL.... why cant you let it go? It wasnt me that started this at all
> This is still going.
>
>
>
> The persistence of you people amazes me.
I know... sorry Fabio. I already said awhile ago now that I am letting the AP thing go...
LL started it again.. Not me. and Kong has just shown his true light as predicted.
I want to let it go to... but this is just to funny for me now.
I really thought my leaving it all alone would have helped... I have been reading thought it all again now since it started...and all I did was stand up for what alot of people were thinking, and Argued my ass off to get LL to understand it...
Its a stalemate with me and LL...I am cool with it.. I am just really suprised that the things LL picked out of my post earlier were the 2 negatives amongst everything nice I said.
Why LL.... why cant you let it go? It wasnt me that started this at all
-
Andrew Deasey
- Obscure
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 12:08
- Location: 3013
Re: * I take back that Apology
Leonard Lin wrote:
> Andrew Deasey wrote:
> >
> http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259 ... alian.aspx
> >
> > Another peice of Australian Law for you too read...You stupid.....
> > hahahaha. ;)
>
> Why would he give a rat's arse about a law that doesn't apply to him?
Lol LL...you didnt read it did you?
HAHAHAHAHA this one is a joke
Literally
> Andrew Deasey wrote:
> >
> http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259 ... alian.aspx
> >
> > Another peice of Australian Law for you too read...You stupid.....
> > hahahaha. ;)
>
> Why would he give a rat's arse about a law that doesn't apply to him?
Lol LL...you didnt read it did you?
HAHAHAHAHA this one is a joke
Literally
-
Master of Clan X
- Prominent
- Posts: 3105
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 03:39
- Location: I am the Master of Clan X
Re: * I take back that Apology
Andrew Deasey wrote:
> Lol LL...you didnt read it did you?
If you had to ask,
Andrew Deasey wrote:
> HAHAHAHAHA this one is a joke
then the joke's on you.
> Lol LL...you didnt read it did you?
If you had to ask,
Andrew Deasey wrote:
> HAHAHAHAHA this one is a joke
then the joke's on you.
-
Kong Jun Yin
- Unknown
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 11:59
- Location: Deep, deep up your attic!
- Contact:
Re: * I take back that Apology
Kong Jun Yin wrote:
> ^ Maybe it'll help if you didn't take the analogy literally.
>
> And why do you try to argue? You will never win. You hold no power over
> them. Its going to stay this way no matter what you do.
Just back from dinner. Do you see the above quote? This wasn't pointed at you. It was to the post above.
We all don't want to scream at each other. You know that just as well as I do. I thought we had left that behind yesterday. But you didn't. I hadn't referred to you in any way today. But you insisted. Do you have anything to say about that?
> ^ Maybe it'll help if you didn't take the analogy literally.
>
> And why do you try to argue? You will never win. You hold no power over
> them. Its going to stay this way no matter what you do.
Just back from dinner. Do you see the above quote? This wasn't pointed at you. It was to the post above.
We all don't want to scream at each other. You know that just as well as I do. I thought we had left that behind yesterday. But you didn't. I hadn't referred to you in any way today. But you insisted. Do you have anything to say about that?
Re: * I take back that Apology
Leonard Lin wrote:
> zyblack wrote:
> > You are basically saying that the 1000 AP was credited because of a ghost and
> not
> > because of the BS server's fault?
>
> You started using analogies, I used a ghost analogy IN THE CONTEXT of YOUR donut
> analogy and now you're accusing me of suggesting there's a ghost? It's OBVIOUSLY an
> analogy as well DUH, and the fact that you took it seriously?? well...
Your actual reference was that of a ghost depositing the donut into the customer's bag and having the customer blame the shop owner for it.
Let's be clear, who is the shop owner? Tyler? BS server?
Who is the ghost? BS server? Or something else entirely? Who was responsible for depositing the APs? It was a system glitch right???
The main point is to figure out who is at fault in the first place for the depositing of the APs into the players' AP bank. And not just simply blaming the players for being greedy and using the APs. If the APs were not there in the first place, we would not have this situation.
Acknowledge that BS server or Tyler Projects is at fault rather than blame the players' please.
> zyblack wrote:
> > You are basically saying that the 1000 AP was credited because of a ghost and
> not
> > because of the BS server's fault?
>
> You started using analogies, I used a ghost analogy IN THE CONTEXT of YOUR donut
> analogy and now you're accusing me of suggesting there's a ghost? It's OBVIOUSLY an
> analogy as well DUH, and the fact that you took it seriously?? well...
Your actual reference was that of a ghost depositing the donut into the customer's bag and having the customer blame the shop owner for it.
Let's be clear, who is the shop owner? Tyler? BS server?
Who is the ghost? BS server? Or something else entirely? Who was responsible for depositing the APs? It was a system glitch right???
The main point is to figure out who is at fault in the first place for the depositing of the APs into the players' AP bank. And not just simply blaming the players for being greedy and using the APs. If the APs were not there in the first place, we would not have this situation.
Acknowledge that BS server or Tyler Projects is at fault rather than blame the players' please.