^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Rainbow King · Post by **Rainbow King** » 01 Jun 2012, 01:38

Rookles 2 wrote:
> GHOST TIER FTW!!!!

STUPID GHOST TIER DOG ATE MY FORT'S p***s!

Nikki A · Post by **Nikki A** » 01 Jun 2012, 01:49

Rookles 2 wrote:
> But yes... I think clans have become far too big. But if a clan isn't
> striving to be stronger, then what's the point?

Agreed on both

> But a trimmed down member limit and a HARD ceiling on level caps (if
> someone levels past the cap, they are not allowed to attack/defend until
> they fall under the cap, or find a new clan for now).

That thought seem incomplete. =P

> Its the only way to keep Sios from being bloated and top heavy. Or, to
> keep everyone happy.......... GHOST TIER FTW!!!!

I am a fan of more medium-large clans instead of more uber clans. I thought the mergers that were happening were good, Power, X-fleet, INA, and there may have been others. Those were good for the game. MARS and Jugg were not... along with WAR and Vg gobbling up clans.... bad. I stand by my thought that 5 tokens were good for smaller clans and 10% level limits instead of 15% were better...

New insane idea: ROLL BACK! Muahahaha! Roll back 1 year! /me falls over laughing as she has flashbacks to the drama of a previous roll-back.

Oh, and I read your ghost tier idea, and it was good.

Supa Mario · Post by **Supa Mario** » 01 Jun 2012, 06:32

> Rookles 2 wrote:
> > But yes... I think clans have become far too big. But if a clan isn't
> > striving to be stronger, then what's the point?
Clans strive to be the strongest... until it comes to going to tier S where u r screwed by the top 4. and living a life of ninja fort kills is not the way to enjoy the game.

Nikki A wrote:
> I am a fan of more medium-large clans instead of more uber clans. I thought the
> mergers that were happening were good, Power, X-fleet, INA, and there may have been
> others. Those were good for the game. MARS and Jugg were not... along with WAR and
> Vg gobbling up clans.... bad. I stand by my thought that 5 tokens were good for
> smaller clans and 10% level limits instead of 15% were better...

Totally agree, as i have said, everything were going well until that cursed mad + sun merge.
As it is stated in the Echoing Ruin card flavor text:

A single misstep unleashes an avalanche of ruin.

Rookles 2 · Post by **Rookles 2** » 01 Jun 2012, 08:15

Right now, even though there is a level cap, clans can grow naturally over that #. If a clan has 14.9% of 200+s they can recruit/poach another. Now they are beyond 15% and can no longer recruit.

However, if one of the clans 199s levels up, they are now well beyond the % cap.

If clans get split up, I suggest making it a hard cap #. You can never go beyond 5% (example). If someone levels to 200 and puts the clan over the cap, they are essentially pacified until the % is back to under the cap. Or they can help another clan for a while.

amandamazing · Post by **amandamazing** » 01 Jun 2012, 08:23

:* Rooks

Rainbow King · Post by **Rainbow King** » 01 Jun 2012, 12:14

amandamazing wrote:
> :* Rooks

O.O all your :*'s belong to MEH!

amandamazing · Post by **amandamazing** » 01 Jun 2012, 16:43

Oops, my bad.

:* Broddie ~~ :3

Andrew Reichert · Post by **Andrew Reichert** » 02 Jun 2012, 02:55

to be perfectly honest, i've never understood why people were such staunch supporters of the old level cap simply because it didn't prevent people within the clan from leveling up and getting an uber percentage.

it doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at all the level 190+'s and figure out which clans will have insane percentages of the 200+'s in the relatively near future unless something changes

Rookles 2 · Post by **Rookles 2** » 02 Jun 2012, 05:04

Stupid level 190ers.

Rookles 2 · Post by **Rookles 2** » 02 Jun 2012, 05:08

One definite downside to dropping the max size to 99...

If we thought alliances were bad after the faction thing was announced... wait until the 4 biggest clans become 12 of the strongest clans all allied together a la Vg-TBS-Hounds (old), Mars/Fred/Ares, Juggz/INA/Seal, War-Leg-Joy-EveryoneElse

Andrew Bowman · Post by **Andrew Bowman** » 02 Jun 2012, 06:18

Rookles 2 wrote:
> One definite downside to dropping the max size to 99...
>
> If we thought alliances were bad after the faction thing was announced...
> wait until the 4 biggest clans become 12 of the strongest clans all allied
> together a la Vg-TBS-Hounds (old), Mars/Fred/Ares, Juggz/INA/Seal,
> War-Leg-Joy-EveryoneElse

True. But with the faster moving Judge, would it really be that bad?

Andrew Reichert · Post by **Andrew Reichert** » 02 Jun 2012, 16:07

don't know about everyone else, but we can barely organize ourselves in one clan, don't know how we'd manage with a ton of clans...

Gamenami Forums

^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99

Re: ^ Max clan size going to be cut to 99