As a non sub user.
Its bad enough that you dont get a 1:1 return for your gunnery input on subs, (290% x 0.8 = 232%), 232% at a range of 300 or 600 is a pretty raw deal.
Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Valashu wrote:As a non sub user.
Its bad enough that you dont get a 1:1 return for your gunnery input on subs, (290% x 0.8 = 232%), 232% at a range of 300 or 600 is a pretty raw deal.
As a experienced sub user.
Its bad enough that you don't get the formula on the damage calculation,
For example, a gunner with 400 gun attribute,
Cannon damage is (400*0.5)/100+1 = 300% damage
Sub damage is (400*0.4)/100+1 = 260% damage
In other words,
Sub damage actually got 87% damage of cannons in this case rather than 80%
I hope this analysis would useful to you, cheers ^w^
-
- Prominent
- Posts: 3105
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 03:39
- Location: I am the Master of Clan X
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Valashu wrote:As a non sub user.
^ this.
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
ftb wrote:Valashu wrote:As a non sub user.
Its bad enough that you dont get a 1:1 return for your gunnery input on subs, (290% x 0.8 = 232%), 232% at a range of 300 or 600 is a pretty raw deal.
As a experienced sub user.
Its bad enough that you don't get the formula on the damage calculation,
For example, a gunner with 400 gun attribute,
Cannon damage is (400*0.5)/100+1 = 300% damage
Sub damage is (400*0.4)/100+1 = 260% damage
In other words,
Sub damage actually got 87% damage of cannons in this case rather than 80%
I hope this analysis would useful to you, cheers ^w^
Guess their marginally better than I thought then, but I still think it is a raw deal that there is any difference in the damage calcs for sub and cannon.
-
- Notable
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 05:51
- Location: FireStorm Fort
- Contact:
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
1st:
If u think rams are so oped, why u dont become rammers instead?
Because u love guns, no? why u love guns?
Because you have fucking RANGE.
So quit complaining.
2nd, the dude that said:
devs hate gunners.
missilers can fill their ships with missiles.
rammer can certainly fill their ships with rams.
gunners can't fill their ships with subcannons (need to mix subs and cannons).
Gunners can fill their ships with whatever the heck its needed. subs, cannon and missiles. Complete control over range-damage, so what the fak are u complaining about?
If u think rams are so oped, why u dont become rammers instead?
Because u love guns, no? why u love guns?
Because you have fucking RANGE.
So quit complaining.
2nd, the dude that said:
devs hate gunners.
missilers can fill their ships with missiles.
rammer can certainly fill their ships with rams.
gunners can't fill their ships with subcannons (need to mix subs and cannons).
Gunners can fill their ships with whatever the heck its needed. subs, cannon and missiles. Complete control over range-damage, so what the fak are u complaining about?
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Not that I agree the ember subs need anything
Still cannot fit my ship full of subs still atm.
Still cannot fit my ship full of subs still atm.
-
- Familiar
- Posts: 275
- Joined: 30 Apr 2012, 17:18
- Location: Port Royale
- Contact:
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Supa Mario wrote:1st:
If u think rams are so oped, why u dont become rammers instead?
Because u love guns, no? why u love guns?
Because you have fucking RANGE.
So quit complaining.
2nd, the dude that said:
devs hate gunners.
missilers can fill their ships with missiles.
rammer can certainly fill their ships with rams.
gunners can't fill their ships with subcannons (need to mix subs and cannons).
Gunners can fill their ships with whatever the heck its needed. subs, cannon and missiles. Complete control over range-damage, so what the fak are u complaining about?
when you equip subs together with missiles and/or cannons, its not as flexible when your just using full missiles or full cannons since subs cannons will most certainly affect your minimum range, taking away the versatility of your other range weapons.
what's the point of equipping cannons with 2000+ range, or missiles with 6500 range when you equip a subs with an average of ~500 range.
Gunner's most notable advantage over Rammer is its range, but if you are using subcannon, that takes away MOST of that advantage with a trade-off for damage.
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Supa Mario wrote:1st:
If u think rams are so oped, why u dont become rammers instead?
Because u love guns, no? why u love guns?
Because you have fucking RANGE.
So quit complaining.
2nd, the dude that said:
devs hate gunners.
missilers can fill their ships with missiles.
rammer can certainly fill their ships with rams.
gunners can't fill their ships with subcannons (need to mix subs and cannons).
Gunners can fill their ships with whatever the heck its needed. subs, cannon and missiles. Complete control over range-damage, so what the fak are u complaining about?
+1
-
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 108
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 09:49
- Location: Flying in Space.
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
Tsk tsk.. all i asked whether you think whether the ember subs need a upgrade..
And i think we're watching a all-out war.
And i think we're watching a all-out war.
-
- Conspicuous
- Posts: 108
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 09:49
- Location: Flying in Space.
Re: Petition for Ember Subs to be upgraded!
le buff mini torpedos please :3