Search found 170 matches
- 22 Mar 2014, 15:27
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: lvl 200 skills?
- Replies: 79
- Views: 16597
Re: lvl 200 skills?
@SneakyMiggy That's true… but not like it matters when there'd be an Ocho achievement to get it. Surrender was a joke skill. For survival outside of clan wars. I'm sure someone who actually uses them could suggest a better one. Do pirates still use sub cannons at 200? Regardless, danger close would ...
- 21 Mar 2014, 01:28
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: lvl 200 skills?
- Replies: 79
- Views: 16597
Re: lvl 200 skills?
I'm not sure we need more skills, but if they do: Sailor: Background Check Immune to Sabotage. Reduces Gold Gain by 2% per Crew Member. Soldier: Surrender Activates if HP is lower than 25% +200% speed, reduces weapon range by 95%. Pirate: Danger Close Weapons are more likely to deal maximum damage a...
- 06 Aug 2013, 03:59
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
Master of Clan X wrote:hon wrote:Adryan Poh wrote:Non-ocho whores
Is there have such a thing? :O
Of course. Those people who make Ocho players buy stuff for them.
Wouldn't that make them an Ocho bitch?
- 05 Aug 2013, 23:38
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
adding to gun should give you armor piercing properties as well as bonus to cannons/subcannons/missile... it only makes sense that every stat gives you 2 attributes I guess thats a reasonable idea, but it would need to be balanced with the current state of Armor Piercing. If AP is great, passive pi...
- 05 Aug 2013, 10:41
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
Good for you... if you care about them so much, why are you here on the forums? should you not be out volunteering or some other random supposedly helpful crap and trying to feed them? Oh, tugging my morality heartstrings. They are not my responsibility. But I'm just signifying the how the weight o...
- 05 Aug 2013, 10:09
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
Arthur Lin wrote:
Why do you make it sound like $500 means something??? are you that poor?? $500 isn't even enough for decent dinner for 2
In Australia, $500 AUD is enough to feed 100 people. I'm sorry I won't let 100 people starve just to get to level 160...again.
- 05 Aug 2013, 09:53
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
Is kinda funny when sub-par low level players comes into a conversation and they think they have a comeback to everything ^^ And its even funnier when the self entitled "high" level players only come to troll other players and offer little to the solution. for under $500 you can be from l...
- 05 Aug 2013, 07:23
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
Maximilian wrote:Example of what? That you are a terrible defender?
Perhaps.
And it wasn't clan war, just self defence.
- 05 Aug 2013, 07:14
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
Also, you do realized that if you had activate the skill fortify, it would pretty much nullify most of armor piercing advantage? I do. I just haven't found a way to bribe the game engine to activate it all the time. the same goes to pre-emptive strike as it is not 100% activation also. So why are y...
- 05 Aug 2013, 07:01
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
hon wrote:Maximilian wrote:The guy who attacked you is thin like a paper, very vulnerable, can be sunk easily if you smart enough.... Too bad you aren't.... :3
+1
Toobad his clan no teach him.
Yeah, its too bad my clan didn't teach me how to pre-emptively know whats going to attack me.
- 05 Aug 2013, 06:34
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
The guy who attacked you is thin like a paper, very vulnerable, can be sunk easily if you smart enough.... Too bad you aren't.... :3 Oh, an insult to my intelligence. How clever of you, truly. Remove the 5% damage penalty of AP. no other change needed :D Oh, thats not going to create any problems a...
- 05 Aug 2013, 06:22
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
weixuan wrote:
Also, you do realized that if you had activate the skill fortify, it would pretty much nullify most of armor piercing advantage?
I do. I just haven't found a way to bribe the game engine to activate it all the time.
- 05 Aug 2013, 05:52
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
on defense, pre-emptive strike minus 20% damage, so he can only do about 320k damage to you in 2 volley, which means with battle repair and 310k HP, you are still alive and will sink him. By the skin of my teeth, but yes. Well, the guy who attacked me had an unsinkable build. I'm pretty sure on def...
- 05 Aug 2013, 05:37
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
The only build that sinks me is full skill glassy cannons. m With that pathetic build, semi glass also can sink you Gotta catch them all. The only build that sinks me is full skill glassy cannons. m So you are saying that rammers are OP'ed because there is only one build that can sink you? Perhaps....
- 05 Aug 2013, 05:23
- Forum: Discussion Board
- Topic: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
- Replies: 188
- Views: 43576
Re: * Update: Armor (5 Aug)
The only build that sinks me is full skill glassy cannons. m So u consider game balance OK if u have unsinkable build? Well, the guy who attacked me had an unsinkable build. I'm pretty sure on defence he would use Pre-emptive strike and still two phase me. So your question is directed at the wrong ...